Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNITO
  • ×
  • Home
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Progetti
  • Persone
  • Competenze
  • Settori
  • Strutture
  • Terza Missione

UNI-FIND
Logo UNITO

|

UNI-FIND

unito.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Progetti
  • Persone
  • Competenze
  • Settori
  • Strutture
  • Terza Missione
  1. Pubblicazioni

Abstract 5: Early and Long-term Safety of Stenting and Endarterectomy in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Patients Outside Randomized Trials

Abstract
Data di Pubblicazione:
2012
Abstract:
Objective. Due to the different stroke risk exposure, advisability of carotid revascularization by carotid stenting (CAS) or endarterectomy (CEA) strictly depends on patients’ symptomatic status. Periprocedural and 5-year data of 2196 consecutive procedures (1080 CAS, 1116 CEA) based on physician-guided indication for CEA vs CAS and performed after training outside randomized trials, were reviewed for safety. Methods. 684 symptomatic and 1512 asymptomatic patients were analyzed for periprocedural stroke/death and 5-year death or stroke incidence. Kaplan-Meier survival curves with type-of-procedure interaction were employed. Results. Symptomatic patients were older (71.9y vs 71.04y), less frequently females (25.3% vs 30.8%) and treated more by CEA (60.8%) than by CAS (p<0.001). Asymptomatic patients were more likely affected by cardiac disease, peripheral disease and hyperlipidemia. Periprocedural stroke/death was higher in symptomatic than in asymptomatic patients (3.5% vs 1.9%;OR 1.8, 95%CI1.07-3.2) without significant differences between CAS and CEA in both symptomatic (4.5%CAS vs 2.9%CEA) and asymptomatic (2.2% CAS vs 1.6% CEA) groups. Symptomatic patients showed higher 5-year mortality and stroke incidence: survival rate was 78.4% in symptomatic and 85.5% in asymptomatic (p<0.0001). Late stroke freedom was 93.5% in symptomatic and 97.7% in asymptomatic (p=0.001). There were no differences, according to the procedure (CAS vs CEA) for treatment, in survival (Symptomatic: 85% vs 75%; Asymptomatic: 83% vs 83%) or late stroke incidence (Symptomatic: 93% vs 93%; Asymptomatic: 97% vs 97%). Conclusions. Symptomatic patients show higher risks after carotid revascularization and 5-year outcomes are inferior to those of asymptomatic patients regardless of the surgical procedure. Periprocedural stroke/death rates, either by CAS or CEA, are within the complication threshold rates suggested in current guidelines for both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.
Tipologia CRIS:
03G-Abstract in Rivista
Keywords:
Carotid arteriesAngioplastySurgeryStrokePrevention
Elenco autori:
Paola De Rango; Massimo Lenti; Enrico Cieri; Piergiorgio Cao; Giuseppe Giordano; Gioele Simonte; Luca Farchioni; Fabio Verzini
Autori di Ateneo:
VERZINI Fabio
Link alla scheda completa:
https://iris.unito.it/handle/2318/1690166
Pubblicato in:
STROKE
Journal
  • Dati Generali

Dati Generali

URL

http://stroke.ahajournals.org/content/43/Suppl_1/A5
  • Utilizzo dei cookie

Realizzato con VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 25.6.1.0