Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNITO
  • ×
  • Home
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Progetti
  • Persone
  • Competenze
  • Settori
  • Strutture
  • Terza Missione

UNI-FIND
Logo UNITO

|

UNI-FIND

unito.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Progetti
  • Persone
  • Competenze
  • Settori
  • Strutture
  • Terza Missione
  1. Progetti

Historical and typological perspectives on anticausativization

Progetto
1. Introduction The (anti)causative alternation is a transitivity alternation concerned with how languages express externally caused (CAUSAL) vs. spontaneously occurring (NONCAUSAL) events. Typologists have shown that languages resort to three main coding patterns to express this alternation (Tubino-Blanco 2020): (i) CAUSATIVE: the causal member is overtly marked, Turkish öl- ‘die’ vs. öl-dür- ‘kill’ (ii) ANTICAUSATIVE: the noncausal member is marked, Italian scioglier-si ‘melt (intr.)’ vs. sciogliere ‘melt (tr.)’ (iii) EQUIPOLLENT: both members are equally marked, Yaqui (Uto-Aztecan) bee-te ‘burn (intr.)’ vs. bee-ta ‘burn (tr.)’ Despite the structural parallelism, it has been pointed out that causative and anticausative markers (AMs) show a cross-linguistically unbalanced distribution. Not only are AMs typologically less frequent than causatives, but it is also rare for AMs to outnumber causatives in the lexicon of individual languages (Nichols et al. 2004). In fact, the very existence of the anticausative pattern, in which the semantically simpler member of the alternation is morphologically more complex, constitutes a puzzle, as it violates the iconicity principle (Haspelmath 2016: 593). Within individual languages, the distribution of AMs is not random, as some verbs trigger AMs more frequently than others. To explain these distributions, scholars have resorted to either verb semantics or frequency effects. Semantics-based accounts appeal to notions such as spontaneity (Haspelmath 1987) and claim that verbs lexicalizing events less likely to occur spontaneously are more likely to trigger AMs, because higher cognitive markedness entails higher structural markedness (Haspelmath 1993: 106). Frequency-based approaches explain marking asymmetries as mirroring frequency asymmetries, based on the assumption that higher usage frequency items are more predictable and thus favor shorter coding (Haspelmath 2021). This means that verbs that more routinely occur in noncausal contexts are less likely to receive AMs (Haspelmath et al. 2014). In particular, Haspelmath (2016) proposes that verb meanings can be ranked according to the spontaneity scale in (1), which predicts that if a language has AMs for a specific class of verbs, it also has them for all verbs lower on the scale. (1) TRANSITIVE ‘cut’ > UNERGATIVE ‘talk’ > AUTOMATIC UNACCUSATIVE ‘melt’ > COSTLY UNACCUSATIVE ‘break’ > AGENTFUL ‘be cut’ Overall, despite the existing research, the fundamental question as to why anticausatives exist remains open. With this project, we aim at building an international network of scholars, in order to develop a new diachronically-oriented approach to the study of AMs. The project is articulated into two main work packages (WP). 2. WP1: the diachronic typology of AMs To understand why anticausativization exists, one must explore how AMs arise in the first place. This WP focuses on the diachrony of AMs cross-linguistically, by tackling two main questions. The first research question concerns the cross-linguistic sources of AMs. Typological works mention only two such sources, reflexives and passives, but there is evidence for alternative developments (Bahrt 2021). We therefore set out to explore the range of non-reflexive sources of AMs. Second, by adopting a source-oriented perspective (Cristofaro 2019), we investigate to what extent the recurrent synchronic distribution of AMs can be explained by considering the diachronic sources and processes whereby they emerge. The hypothesis is that individual sources of AMs may give rise to either anticausativization or equipollent patterns, and this may explain why the anticausativization pattern is overall rare. In addition, we also explore whether cross-linguistic diachronic data supports the existence of the spontaneity scale in (1). Available diachronic evidence does not fully match our expectations: AMs rarely originate
  • Dati Generali
  • Aree Di Ricerca

Dati Generali

Partecipanti (2)

INGLESE Guglielmo   Responsabile scientifico  
GORIA Eugenio   Partecipante  

Referenti

CINI Monica   Amministrativo  

Dipartimenti coinvolti

STUDI UMANISTICI   Principale  

Tipo

Grant for Internationalization - GFI - Programmazione Triennale 21-23

Finanziatore

Università degli Studi di TORINO
Ente Finanziatore

Partner

Università degli Studi di TORINO

Contributo Totale (assegnato) Ateneo (EURO)

25.000€

Periodo di attività

Settembre 1, 2022 - Dicembre 23, 2023

Durata progetto

15 mesi

Aree Di Ricerca

Settori (16)


SH5_8 - Cultural studies, cultural identities and memories, cultural heritage - (2020)

Settore L-LIN/01 - Glottologia e Linguistica

CULTURA, ARTE e CREATIVITA' - Culture Comparate

CULTURA, ARTE e CREATIVITA' - Culture moderne

CULTURA, ARTE e CREATIVITA' - Fisica e Beni Culturali

CULTURA, ARTE e CREATIVITA' - Immaginazione: percezione, cognizione, immagine e linguaggio

LINGUE e LETTERATURA - Antichistica

LINGUE e LETTERATURA - Francesistica

LINGUE e LETTERATURA - Germanistica

LINGUE e LETTERATURA - Iberistica

LINGUE e LETTERATURA - Linguistica

LINGUE e LETTERATURA - Romenistica e Slavistica

SCIENZE DELLA VITA e FARMACOLOGIA - Interazioni tra molecole, cellule, organismi e ambiente

SCIENZE MATEMATICHE, CHIMICHE, FISICHE - Storia e insegnamento della Matematica

SOCIETA', POLITICA, DIRITTO e RELAZIONI INTERNAZIONALI - Migrazioni e interculturalità

SOCIETA', POLITICA, DIRITTO e RELAZIONI INTERNAZIONALI - Relazioni internazionali, cooperazione allo sviluppo e area studies

Parole chiave

tipologia linguistica
No Results Found
  • Utilizzo dei cookie

Realizzato con VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 25.5.0.1